{"id":2331,"date":"2017-02-19T12:24:59","date_gmt":"2017-02-19T11:24:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/firearms-united.com\/?p=2331"},"modified":"2017-02-27T08:43:43","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T07:43:43","slug":"eu-gun-ban-dita-charanzova-speaks-out-to-firearms-united","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/eu-gun-ban-dita-charanzova-speaks-out-to-firearms-united\/","title":{"rendered":"Sm\u011brnice o zbran\u00edch z pohledu st\u00ednov\u00e9ho zpravodaje"},"content":{"rendered":"Original interview by LEX:\u00a0http:\/\/gunlex.cz\/clanky\/hlavni-clanky\/2628-smernice-o-zbranich-z-pohledu-stinoveho-zpravodaje<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

P\u0159ed ned\u00e1vnem byl ve v\u00fdboru IMCO<\/a>\u00a0schv\u00e1len n\u00e1vrh zm\u011bny Sm\u011brnice 2008\/51\/ES o nab\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00ed a dr\u017een\u00ed zbran\u00ed, kter\u00fd bude v b\u0159eznu projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n na pl\u00e9nu Evropsk\u00e9ho parlamentu. O postupu vyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed a schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed tohoto n\u00e1vrhu jsme mluvili se st\u00ednovou zpravodajkou za frakci ALDE, \u010deskou europoslankyn\u00ed Ditou Charanzovou<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Pan\u00ed poslankyn\u011b, jak se v\u00e1m cel\u00fd proces jev\u00ed z pozice st\u00ednov\u00e9ho zpravodaje?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Mus\u00edm \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee za celou dobu m\u00e9ho p\u016fsoben\u00ed v Bruselu \u2013 jak na st\u00e1l\u00e9m zastoupen\u00ed \u010cR, tak i pozd\u011bji v Evropsk\u00e9m parlamentu \u2013 jsem se asi nesetkala s n\u00e1vrhem, kter\u00fd by byl takto siln\u011b zpolitizovan\u00fd, a to p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm v sam\u00e9m z\u00e1v\u011bru vyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed. Osobn\u011b mi to velmi vadilo. Evropsk\u00e1 komise vyv\u00edjela maxim\u00e1ln\u00ed tlak na urychlen\u00e9 p\u0159ijet\u00ed textu, kter\u00fd by obsahoval co mo\u017en\u00e1 nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed restrikce z hlediska dr\u017een\u00ed zbran\u00ed, ani\u017e by byla schopn\u00e1 dolo\u017eit jejich skute\u010dnou pot\u0159ebu.<\/p>\n

Jedn\u00edm ze z\u00e1kladn\u00edch p\u0159edpoklad\u016f kvalitn\u00edho legislativn\u00edho procesu je p\u0159itom vypracov\u00e1n\u00ed odborn\u00e9 studie hodnocen\u00ed dopad\u016f, posouzen\u00ed problematiky \u2013 popis st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed situace a dopady \u010di p\u0159\u00ednosy navrhovan\u00fdch zm\u011bn. Nic takov\u00e9ho n\u00e1m ale Komise nep\u0159edlo\u017eila, pouze se dovol\u00e1vala na n\u011bkter\u00e9 p\u0159edchoz\u00ed studie, kter\u00e9 ale \u0159e\u0161ily pouze d\u00edl\u010d\u00ed v\u011bci. Studie dopadu je, resp. by m\u011bla b\u00fdt pro rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed poslance naprosto kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00e1 v\u011bc, n\u011bkolikr\u00e1t a ve\u0159ejn\u011b jsem proto jej\u00ed vypracov\u00e1n\u00ed po\u017eadovala i j\u00e1.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Dal\u0161\u00ed podobnou v\u011bc\u00ed je p\u0159\u00edstup k ve\u0159ejnosti. P\u0159ed pod\u00e1n\u00edm n\u00e1vrhu byly vyps\u00e1ny dv\u011b ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 konzultace. Jejich v\u00fdsledky, a odpov\u011bd\u00ed p\u0159i\u0161lo kolem 28 tis\u00edc, nebyly nijak zohledn\u011bny. Tak pro\u010d je tedy Komise vlastn\u011b vypisuje?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Skv\u011bl\u00fd dotaz na Evropskou komisi, polo\u017eila jsem ho sama v\u00a0jednom ze sv\u00fdch vystoupen\u00ed adresovan\u00fdch pr\u00e1v\u011b Komisi \u2013 z\u016fstal ov\u0161em bez reakce.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Jak\u00e1 je vlastn\u011b \u00faloha Komise v cel\u00e9m procesu?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Komise m\u00e1 z\u00e1konod\u00e1rnou iniciativu, tedy m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo pod\u00e1vat samotn\u00e9 n\u00e1vrhy, ale legislativu fakticky nep\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1. V\u00a0praxi to vypad\u00e1 tak, \u017ee p\u0159iprav\u00ed n\u00e1vrh a spolu s\u00a0odborn\u00fdmi podklady, mj. t\u0159eba se studi\u00ed dopadu, je p\u0159ed\u00e1 Parlamentu a Rad\u011b, co\u017e jsou instituce, kter\u00e9 n\u00e1sledn\u011b rozhoduj\u00ed. Komise v\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bhu projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed dopl\u0148uje na vy\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed odborn\u00e9 informace a nap\u0159\u00edklad expertn\u00ed vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed, m\u016f\u017ee n\u00e1vrh taky zcela st\u00e1hnout z\u00a0projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed, pokud k\u00a0tomu shled\u00e1 d\u016fvody.<\/p>\n

U zbra\u0148ov\u00e9 sm\u011brnice bylo v\u0161echno naopak. Opakovan\u011b jsme \u017e\u00e1dali studii, s vy\u010d\u00edslen\u00edm kolika lid\u00ed a zbran\u00ed se omezen\u00ed dotknou a jak moc, kolik je takov\u00fdmi zbran\u011bmi p\u00e1ch\u00e1no teroristick\u00fdch \u010din\u016f a kriminality atd. Ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u011b. Komise nakonec pod tlakem m\u00edsto vypracov\u00e1n\u00ed studie rozeslala dotazn\u00edky \u010dlensk\u00fdm st\u00e1t\u016fm a p\u0159edala n\u00e1m odpov\u011bdi, ze kter\u00fdch ale zjevn\u011b vyplynulo, \u017ee dot\u010den\u00fdch lid\u00ed a zbran\u00ed by byly nejm\u00e9n\u011b statis\u00edce.<\/p>\n

Ta jedn\u00e1n\u00ed byla opravdu nestandardn\u00ed, n\u011bkter\u00e9 n\u00e1vrhy p\u0159in\u00e1\u0161eli z\u00e1stupci Komise na zased\u00e1n\u00ed na posledn\u00ed chv\u00edli, nebyli schopni dolo\u017eit d\u016fvody, byli zcela nep\u0159ipraveni, jednou si dokonce p\u0159i m\u00e9m dotazu pomohli s\u00a0definic\u00ed sta\u017eenou z\u00a0wikipedie, co\u017e u\u017e bylo hodn\u011b siln\u00e9 kafe asi nejen na m\u011b – rozhodn\u011b tenkr\u00e1t neusp\u011bli.<\/p>\n

\u00a0Pro\u010d to podle V\u00e1s Komise d\u011bl\u00e1? Jak\u00e9 je pozad\u00ed t\u00e9 politick\u00e9 motivace?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nechci se zde pou\u0161t\u011bt do n\u011bjak\u00fdch konspirativn\u00edch spekulac\u00ed. Faktem ale je, \u017ee Evropsk\u00e1 komise m\u00e1 na t\u00e9to sm\u011brnici eminentn\u00ed z\u00e1jem tak\u00e9 z toho d\u016fvodu, \u017ee je to v tuto chv\u00edli v podstat\u011b jedin\u00fd legislativn\u00ed n\u00e1vrh, kter\u00fd m\u011bl \u0159e\u0161it zhor\u0161enou bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed situaci v Evrop\u011b. A to bez ohledu na to, jestli to tak nakonec je \u010di nikoliv. V neposledn\u00ed \u0159ad\u011b nen\u00ed tajemstv\u00edm, \u017ee tuto sm\u011brnici si na Komisi prosadila Francie, pro ni\u017e je d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9, aby m\u011bla co p\u0159edlo\u017eit sv\u00fdm ob\u010dan\u016fm p\u0159ed prezidentsk\u00fdmi volbami v dubnu. A bohu\u017eel t\u011bmto tlak\u016fm nakonec podlehla zpravodajka i kolegov\u00e9 z ostatn\u00edch frakc\u00ed. Za sebe mohu \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee se ni\u010d\u00edm z toho nec\u00edt\u00edm v\u00e1z\u00e1na, jeliko\u017e mne na prvn\u00edm m\u00edst\u011b zaj\u00edmaly z\u00e1jmy \u010desk\u00fdch ob\u010dan\u016f.<\/p>\n

Mezi dr\u017eiteli zbran\u00ed nejen v \u010cesk\u00e9 republice, ale v cel\u00e9 Evrop\u011b i ve \u0160v\u00fdcarsku vzbudil n\u00e1vrh i jeho projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed mnoho emoc\u00ed a negativn\u00edch reakc\u00ed nejen v\u016f\u010di Sm\u011brnici, ale i proti Evropsk\u00e9 unii jako takov\u00e9.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ano, toto riziko si \u010d\u00e1st Evropsk\u00e9ho parlamentu uv\u011bdomuje. I poslanci na\u0161\u00ed liber\u00e1ln\u00ed frakce upozor\u0148uj\u00ed, \u017ee tady Komise naprosto nesmysln\u011b a zbyte\u010dn\u011b vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed spousty nep\u0159\u00e1tel. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed Komise v tom smyslu, \u017ee pokud Parlament sm\u011brnici odm\u00edtne, odm\u00edtne t\u00edm tak\u00e9 chr\u00e1nit ob\u010dany p\u0159ed teroristickou hrozbou, m\u00e1 za v\u00fdsledek v\u011bt\u0161inovou podporu tomuto n\u00e1vrhu.<\/p>\n

My tu bohu\u017eel s\u00a0vani\u010dkou vyl\u00e9v\u00e1me i d\u00edt\u011b. Pos\u00edlit bezpe\u010dnost v\u00a0Evrop\u011b pot\u0159ebujeme, j\u00e1 bych byla prvn\u00ed, kdo by pro to zvedl ruku, tak\u017ee tahle Sm\u011brnice by mohla b\u00fdt v principu u\u017eite\u010dnou, pokud by nezasahovala do osobn\u00edch svobod lid\u00ed, pokud by zajistila, aby se na trh nedost\u00e1valy\u00a0\u0161patn\u011b znehodnocen\u00e9 zbran\u011b atd. Ale cesta, kudy se vydala Komise, je prost\u011b \u0161patn\u011b. Pokud bychom cht\u011bli\u00a0vytvo\u0159it funguj\u00edc\u00ed a u\u017eite\u010dnou evropskou sm\u011brnici, bylo by ji t\u0159eba p\u0159ipravovat obdobn\u011b jako t\u0159eba \u010desk\u00fd z\u00e1kon o zbran\u00edch \u2013 promy\u0161len\u011b, na z\u00e1klad\u011b fakt\u016f, a neomezovat svobodu ob\u010dan\u016f v\u00edce, ne\u017e je nezbytn\u011b nutn\u00e9 k zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed bezpe\u010dnosti. To se sna\u017e\u00edm v r\u00e1mci projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed prosazovat.<\/p>\n

Jak\u00fd pl\u00e1nujete dal\u0161\u00ed postup?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dal\u0161\u00ed f\u00e1ze projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed je hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed na pl\u00e9nu Evropsk\u00e9ho parlamentu. Zde se pokus\u00edm p\u0159edlo\u017eit n\u011bkter\u00e9 pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy, \u201epokus\u00edm se\u201c \u0159\u00edk\u00e1m proto, \u017ee na pl\u00e9nu nem\u016f\u017ee p\u0159edkl\u00e1dat pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy jednotliv\u00fd poslanec, ale pouze skupina alespo\u0148 \u010dty\u0159iceti poslanc\u016f nebo cel\u00e1 jedna frakce. Tak\u017ee bude nutn\u00e9 usilovat tak\u00e9 o tuto podporu. O podan\u00fdch pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00edch n\u00e1vrz\u00edch se pak bude hlasovat. V\u00fdsledek v tuto chv\u00edli nechci a ani nem\u016f\u017eu p\u0159edj\u00edmat, prom\u00edtne se do n\u011bj jist\u011b cel\u00e1 \u0159ada okolnost\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Jsem ale odhodl\u00e1na bojovat d\u00e1l, jeliko\u017e proces projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00e9to sm\u011brnice je\u0161t\u011b nen\u00ed zcela ukon\u010den. Pokud bychom prohr\u00e1li tuto bitvu, m\u00e1me je\u0161t\u011b jako \u010cesk\u00e1 republika mo\u017enost obr\u00e1tit se k\u00a0Evropsk\u00e9mu soudn\u00edmu dvoru s\u00a0\u017ealobou. Osobn\u011b bych to podporovala.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

zapsal: David Kar\u00e1sek<\/strong> –\u00a0\u010dlen p\u0159edstavenstva LEX z.s.<\/em>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Je n\u00e1m l\u00edto, tato polo\u017eka je k dispozici pouze v English<\/a> For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>\n

The Firearms United network \u2013 one of the main voices of oppositions to the EU Gun Ban representing gun owners from all around Europe \u2013 interviewed Czech MEP Dita Charanzov\u00e1, shadow rapporteur for ALDE and herself one of the staunchest opponents to the European Commission’s restrictive proposals<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":2346,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[164,120,40,93],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2331"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2331"}],"version-history":[{"count":37,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2392,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2331\/revisions\/2392"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/cz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}