{"id":1777,"date":"2016-11-19T19:45:18","date_gmt":"2016-11-19T18:45:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/firearms-united.com\/?p=1777"},"modified":"2016-12-02T20:41:23","modified_gmt":"2016-12-02T19:41:23","slug":"ia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.firearms-united.com\/es\/ia\/","title":{"rendered":"Our Impact Assessment"},"content":{"rendered":"

Disculpa, pero esta entrada est\u00e1 disponible s\u00f3lo en Ingl\u00e9s Estadounidense<\/a> y Alem\u00e1n<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in this site default language. You may click one of the links to switch the site language to another available language.<\/p>The European Commission has so far failed to support the EU Gun Ban plans with an impact assessment \u2013 most likely because carrying on an impact assessment would cripple the gun ban plans, as its outcomes would seriously contradict the anti-gun agenda. Two members of the first panel brought on their own evaluation, with facts and figures, that were the true centerpieces of the event.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Katja Triebel, head of research for the Firearms United network, introduced her own impact assessment \u2013 a document drafted closely following the EU impact assessment guidelines, largely based on many of the documents that the European Commission is trying to use to justify its ban plans, and impressive both in terms of detail and sheer workload that was necessary to generate it.<\/p>\n