The Czech Have Challenged the Faulty Firearms Directive in Court!

Vabandame, see kanne on saadaval ainult %LANG : ja %. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in this site default language. You may click one of the links to switch the site language to another available language.

This just in: Czech Republic Legal Action confirmed!

Now it is official – The misguided firearms directive will be challenged in the ECJ (European Court of Justice) [1]

The Czech ministry of Interior has filed a suit 9th of August to prevent the implementation of the EU Firearms Directive, which would help the national authorities of the Member States to not implement the already faulty directive on national level.

The Czech are requesting both suspension of national implementation for the duration of the legal action (which might take months, best case years) and complete dismissal of the firearms directive.

According to Czech Interior Minister Milan Chovanec “Such a massive punishment of decent arms holders is unacceptable, because banning legally-held weapons has no connection with the fight against terrorism. This is not only a nonsensical decision once again undermining people’s trust in the EU, but implementing the directive could also have a negative impact on the internal security of the Czech Republic, because a large number of weapons could move to the black market.”

Firearms United completely and totally agrees with the statement above.

The Czech Republic quotes a total of four grounds for repeal of the Directive: [2]

  • The Union legislature has exceeded its powers by adopting the directive. Although the Directive has been adopted to remove obstacles to the internal market, its real aim is to combat terrorism and other serious crime exclusively. However, the EU legislator does not have the power to adopt harmonization measures in this area.
  • By adopting the Directive, the Union legislature breached the principle of proportionality , since it did not address the question of the proportionality of the measures implemented and did not carry out an impact assessment. This subsequently led to the adoption of measures manifestly inadequate and disproportionate to the objective pursued – for example, the directive prohibits broadly the types of weapons that are not used in Europe for the purpose of committing terrorism or other crimes.
  • The Directive is contrary to the principle of legal certainty. A number of the provisions of the contested directive are not sufficiently clear and precise to enable the persons concerned to unequivocally recognize their rights and obligations.
  • The directive has a discriminatory nature – it allows for an exception to the ban on possession of weapons, but it can only fall on the Swiss system of keeping military weapons on termination of military service without the same exceptions being used by other states.

In addition to this, in June Czech parliament approved a bill which puts the right to keep and bear arms in the Czech constitution as a first European nation.

( If someone from Czech Republic is reading this – is your country full already, or do you still have need for IT-engineers who seek asylum and are willing to pay taxes and work for a living? )




3 Comments on “The Czech Have Challenged the Faulty Firearms Directive in Court!”

  1. Hier nicht erwähnt, ist die Verschärfung der Aufbewahrungspflicht, für die es ebenfalls keine plausible
    Begründung gibt (auch wenn man sich die Hintergründe denken kann).

    Bevor wir alle mit einer, dann bestimmt auch erlaubnispflichtigen, Erbsenpistole, mit der nur noch Wattebällchen verschossen werden dürfen, auf dem Stand stehen oder nach Tschechien emigriert sind, sollten wir gemeinsam überlegen, wie wir gegen diese EU-Waffenrichtlinie vorgehen.

    Wer diesmal nicht betroffen wurde, sollte sich darüber im Klaren sein, dass seine Rechte (egal ob waffenrechtlich oder andere bürgerliche Freiheiten betreffend) mit der nächsten oder übernächsten Salamischeibe mit Sicherheit auch beschnitten werden.

    Mein Vorschlag: Große Demo in Berlin und zwar noch vor der Wahl!

    1. P. S. Wirkungsvoll wären auch simultane Demonstrationen in mehreren Städten unter dem selben Motto. Das Thema sollte sich nicht auf das Waffenrecht beschränken, sondern alle ansprechen, die nicht gerne als lebende Zielscheiben und Punchingbälle herumlaufen bzw. von der Regulierungswut der EU die Nase voll haben.

Lisa kommentaar